Brian Warner <[email protected]> writes: > On 3/5/12 11:38 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >> >> No argument about figuring things out, but from a security viewpoint >> it would be nice to have a tahoe server process that does not have the >> client code even loaded. (I realize there is a notion of a WUI and a >> node that is client and server, but I prefer to run nodes that are >> clients and nodes that are servers and keep them totally separate.) > > Yup. > >> FWIW, on NetBSD 5.1ish i386, python 2.6, I have a process running an >> introducer, 33K size, 13K RSS, and a storage node, 52K size, 20K RSS. > > 33 *K*? Surely you mean 33 megabytes (maybe 33k pages of 1kB each, or > something?).
Sorry, I did indeed mean MB. I had just been reading about retrocomputing too recently and must have been thinking of the good old days, when programs that fit in 33K could do something useful. > I think the tahoe Introducer code path imports a lot less code the > client/server node. Changing the structure to split client from server > in a similar way would probably help. That would be nice. But, I was surprised that the server was only 52M/20M (and still surprised that I could say "only 52M").
pgpXRnfAInTgd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
