-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/08/12 08:57, Tony Arcieri wrote: > These are the only two options. For those who desire > "reliability", these are the only buckets that reliability can be > segmented into. So far I have not heard *any* good arguments > towards strong consistency.
Hi Tony, Thanks for explaining the CAP theorem. I believe erpo41 made a suggestion that would switch Tahoe's behaviour from availability to consistency: make H (also known as shares.happy) greater than half the number of storage nodes, so writes can only succeed in at most one component of a partitioned network. Do you think that would work? Cheers, Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQIiMpAAoJEBEET9GfxSfMLJMIAKiGmb+nfpur8tads5dFKwqF VRcXlVv2XmXOmR2qbpK7TmhfQ+1MPkUjEMSq/Ha8xC5n0Dd6fC4uswSJHX5gWZrU WkBpPXwdOvf7uf7EfZzUJXG7zJaEoa9H/zNOxY7rSoU97m+YAtOkr3c4ZOZrmeq3 vM6x1MrhJjg5XZqnsOxVzXvTKL6LTcHdzQQDQtItXXF+UHKgzPDZb7DiKlt+Towe OfBmIcjaArssImjI6p/QLIZyTRmX4vglj2/ht1MgGWVd/7mFmRZ36ZsjOVOSbjyP 81f6lGfqc3U1XZNUWj1MMVl50T9M2PYI8Nl0625kRk9/SKh4E1GaERYzPrYFB68= =RaI3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
