Hello!
Yes you are right. For some reason i was thinking only random bytes for
padding.
Regards,
Iraklis
On 07/10/2013 04:06 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Iraklis . <[email protected]> wrote:
That would destroy any dedup service if different random bytes are appended.
Even if the same number of random bytes are appended for equivalent encryption
keys. Or i am missing sth?
Hello, Iraklis! Good to hear from you.
Let's make all pad bytes be "0" before encryption. They will be
encrypted along with the file bytes.
Therefore, as long as the same number of padding bytes are appended
whenever the encryption key is the same, then the dedup (convergent
encryption) property is preserved.
Right?
Regards,
Zooko
_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
