Den 17 feb 2015 13:51 skrev "str4d" <st...@i2pmail.org>: > > I2P is an anonymous analogue of the Internet, so it is disingenuous to > compare it to a user's home network. If you have a private network > that you have full control over and that can be isolated from the > outside, then you have no need of the anonymity (and overhead) that > I2P provides.
I was explicitly only talking about the particular use case where public introducers are used with no restrictions on who can participate as storage nodes. Because as far as I can see, that's the most common combination of using I2P with Tahoe-LAFS. When I was talking about the I2P version, I was including the differences in configuration.
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
