(in response to warner@'s ticket comments) I agree that anonymous is an imprecise word.
To really talk about this, we need to name the entities and talk about who can figure out what. One might want: network eavesdroppers can't determine that someone is running tahoe network eavesdroppers can't determine which introducer and storage nodes a nodes is talking to storage nodes can't figure out the identity of a node (seems very hard) So, having the introducer and each storage node as a hidden service, and all access over tor is probably a useful intermediate point towards the strictest definition one could conjure up. Calling that "network-anonymous" is probably useful.
pgpiqSwkK1STN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list [email protected] https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
