On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:25:49 +0200 (CEST), "Yann Dirson" said: > But in either case, I agree it is not trivial to do with only plain cvs. > That would surely be easier with cvsps.
I'm not sure the cvsps source is even supposed to work at this point. My understanding is that the only reason the cvsps code is in there is that the cvs classes are derived from it. I could be wrong. It would have been smart to look at how cvsps dealt with tags before writing the tag handling code for the cvs source, but I didn't, so I'm not familiar with the funky/invalid classification you refer to. I'll take a look. -Aaron _______________________________________________ Tailor mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/tailor
