[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mon Apr 23 13:41:09 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* obfuscate author named in a lossless way
[obfuscate author named in a lossless way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
hunk ./vcpx/changes.py 139
+ author = ' [at] '.join(author.split('@'))
+ author = ' [dot] '.join(author.split('.'))
}
Hi Zooko,
is this really desiderable/needed/effective? Isn't is rather an UI
issue, that is lazily delaying the obfuscation at "print" time? Last but
no least, are there still some email-sniffer out there that doesn't know
about this poor human's attempt to trick them?
What worries me is that even if it isn't currently used that way, the
.author could have (and has, for darcs for example) an impact in
something behind the scene... At the very least, I'd introduce a
configuration option...
thank you,
ciao, lele.
_______________________________________________
Tailor mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/tailor
