Lele Gaifax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> About your first patch: under which condition you found a MOVE on a
> file and the destination is already versioned? I ask, because I bet
> most of the systems would fail to carry on a similar action, so maybe
> the fix should be applied at an upper layer.

I could do this in Mercurial, and Tailor tried to replicate the action.
It makes semantic sense, so I would argue that Subversion is deficient
here.

> About the second, the first hunk: does hg manifests know about
> directories? 

I don't think so.  Mercurial really only looks at the files.

> And what about the second hunk, that creates an empty file just before
> doing a copy over it... can you explain why that is needed?

Whoopsie.  That seems to be from an unrelated change I made a few months
ago to compensate for a bug that's since been fixed.  Just ignore that
hunk.  Sorry about that.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
Tailor mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/tailor

Reply via email to