Hi, Martin Owens wrote (12 Sep 2011 14:40:17 GMT) : > [...] it's existence is only really to solve some python related > problems when it comes to gtk.
Can you please elaborate what problems? > This is important for threading and window management and perhaps > managing lists and such, but otherwise it's not too important to > keep it in. Can you please elaborate? I'm sure gtkme solves some problems, but frankly, tons of other pygtk apps do work without gtkme, so you'll understand we need a bit more than "it solves some problems" to be convinced we need it... especially when it currently *creates* problems for us. Maybe I missed the place where all this is explained, but even a README file I was not able to find. > Same rules apply for all upstream, it's better to commit code > upstream than to maintain it downstream. Sure. I think Alan's question rather was whether we want to go on using gtkme at all, not whether we want to maintain it ourselves. Bye, -- intrigeri <[email protected]> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | Every now and then I get a little bit restless | and I dream of something wild. _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
