Hi, Given that the reason the package was uploaded to experimental was because it was during the freeze, I don't see a reason why we shouldn't go ahead and upload to unstable. Any concerns with that?
Cheers, tony On 09/13/2011 03:52 AM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Rémi Debay wrote (13 Sep 2011 10:32:45 GMT) : >> I did not get any user feedbacks for this package. > > You might get some from us soon. If you don't, you can assume the > packages currently in Debian experimental work well enough for our I2P > users: no news is good news! > >> I know I2P doesnt use the debian package but one downloaded from >> mainstream. > > I think I2P uses whatever libraries you throw at it. As long as > service-wrapper-java is concerned, we (Tails) throw your packages from > Debian experimental at it, not the PPA. (BTW, why not setup a > packaging team with the persons who have been doing their own stuff > in a PPA?) > >> I may update the package by november. > > This would be most welcome. Do you envision an upload to unstable at > some point? > > Bye, > -- > intrigeri <[email protected]> > | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc > | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc > | So what?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
