Max wrote (23 Oct 2011 13:34:05 GMT) : > 23.10.2011 04:08, intrigeri пишет: >> I see you went the sudo way. The (minimal) audit that was conducted >> before deciding this solution was safe must be documented somewhere.
> Note was added to readme. I notice this file has changed, I see the current implementation is described there, but I don't see anything that explains why this solution is safe. cheers, -- intrigeri <[email protected]> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | Did you exchange a walk on part in the war | for a lead role in the cage? _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
