12/03/2011 11:16 AM, intrigeri: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (30 Nov 2011 13:57:41 GMT) : >> 11/29/2011 08:06 PM, intrigeri: >>>>> - feature/more_languages: I don't remember why it was not merged yet >>> >>>> Before merging, are there any more languages we should include >>>> (currently Russian, Farsi and Vietnamese). >>> >>> No idea. If these languages are ready to go in, I wonder why other >>> not-ready-yet languages should prevent this from happening. > >> Sorry, what I meant was "before the merge into testing [= freeze]". > > Merged into devel, then. This does not prevent us from merging the > branch again before the freeze if it's improved until then. > > About "adding more languages": I don't know how we would pick a few > more languages among all possible ones. I'd rather see us spend time > obsoleting this problem (== prepare and release tails-greeter) than > solving it.
The boot menu part may be obsoleted, but adding the language packages will not be. Or am I missing anything (geez, I said it again :)). >> Or did I miss anything? > > I think you missed the "who am I talking to" part. That wiki page is > 5 pages long. It has no TOC. The "Next things to do" section reads > that single sentence: "Look at what Windows XP, Vista and Seven look > like and research suitable themes." A few paragraphs later, a "Plan > for integration" section explains much was done already, and lists > other things that remain to be done. When the reader arrives at this > point, s/he has already read three full pages without a chance to > understand what's the actual thing that's happening and what may need > to be discussed further. The task is is todo/research state. Well... The todo/research tag is still applicable to the Windows Vista/7 themes. > I've personally followed most of the process because you kept me in > touch over private email; even so, I have to re-read that *entire* > long wiki page to refresh my memories, including many implementation > details I don't care about, because there's no other way I can quickly > get what's the point, what's currently blocking, what may need to be > discussed. This very mailing-list is being asked to make some sort of > collective decision about this topic. I think the way it was asked is > such we can be almost sure nobody but you and I will provide any > feedback, because the bar is put way too high for others to > participate. Even I find it painful. These are the reasons why I wrote > I find it hard to decide anything, see? I completely reorganized the page in 2fa2ce3, removed some redundant cruft and set clearer priorities. Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
