Hi, > anonym wrote (24 Jan 2012 13:30:18 GMT) :
> It turns out your wget test from earlier in this test isn't bullet > proof... unless you run squeeze (I run wheezy). Suqeeze's wget > (1.12) produces cert errors for several of our new pool members. Damn. > Since fetching wget (and its deps in particular) from unstable likely is > out of the question, ... another possibility would be to ship a wget backport, but I'm not in the mood to maintain it for a year or so, given we have perfectly fine alternatives. > Otherwise I must say that feature/more_resilient_htpdate seem to work > perfectly now. I think I have fixed all errors anonym detected by implementing his suggestions. Please review my last few commits and merge this branch into stable and devel as you see fit. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | Then we'll come from the shadows. _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
