anonym wrote (17 Feb 2012 11:27:47 GMT) : > So, to the question: which one we should use in Tails?
Let me clarify, in case the matter at hand is not clear enough for those who did not follow closely: I believe we need to decide which of these should be the only *supported* one (as in: it's documented, we're happy to provide support for it, and our GUI tools silently setup this kind of persistent directories). As far as I know, whatever decision we make, the (live-boot) backend will continue to support both systems, and advanced users may want to edit their $MEDIA/live.persist by hand, if they want to use the other system for a specific set of directories. <Insert disclaimer here: at their own risk, YMMV, unsupported, etc.> [...] > Hence bind-mounts seem to be the more sensible approach to me. Seconded. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | Every now and then I get a little bit restless | and I dream of something wild. _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
