My take on tlsdate: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be a good replacement for htp?
No, since tlsdate has no features: see TODO items 5 and 6, for instance (daemonization and clock skewing), and also items 9 and 1 (proxy support and leaking local clock). The claim about “parsing the header with questionable code”, on the other hand, is silly — see my reply to the email that you referenced. Granted, I wrote about C code, and Tails uses Perl HTPDate version, so YMMV. Even without https support in C HTPDate, it seems more attractive to me than current tlsdate. With all that said, I actually intend to fork tlsdate at some point and implement the required features, but it's quite low priority. -- Maxim Kammerer Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
