hi, [email protected] wrote (08 Jun 2012 18:11:31 GMT) : > Conclusion, if we are going for hidden services, we need more > hidden services.
Right. I'd be happy to see our current multiple-pools HTP system migrated to hidden services, if one suggests enough stable HS to replace the current non-HS members of our pools. > That's why my bet is on the hidden services horse. If hidden > services get impersonated in the future, torproject will adapt and > fix the issue. On the other hand, I don't expect the SSL CA issue to > be resolved anytime soon. Looks like I was confused, and I now agree with you on this specific aspect of things. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
