[email protected] wrote (07 Aug 2012 18:29:37 GMT) : >> From: intrigeri <[email protected]> >> >> Can you please publish the commits and tag used to build the >> WhisperBack 1.6~alpha1 .deb?
> I can do that, but I fail to see the interest to publish a changelog > entry and a tag for a release that only lives in an unfinished > feature branch. Seriously, do I really have to explain why it makes sense to publish a way to easily find the source of every published version number and binary package? > What is the interest you see? I'll give only one: peer review. How will I compare the source of 1.6~alpha1 with the next ~alpha2 or 1.6 final or whatever, when $we release it, if these tags don't exist? I do know it's Python, and I do know about debdiff, but still, we use Git for a (few) reason(s). _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
