Hi, > From: intrigeri <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:47:50 +0200 > > Hi, > > [email protected] wrote (26 Sep 2012 17:44:20 GMT) : > > https://tails.boum.org/todo/include_download_manager/ > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > [...] it might be useful to include a download managar in Tails. > > A usecase could be to try to download a big file across separate > > working sessions. > > I think this usecase is worth supporting, e.g. to make it easier to > download ISO images such as Tails' ones. I would consider it > relatively low-priority, though. > I do agree. Others?
> I think this download manager must have a simple GUI and as few > features as possible. > > I'm not sure what I think of Iceweasel integration. > > I don't intend to put much energy into that, but still, I searched > a bit the Debian packages database with that usecase in mind. > > > If so, [uget](http://urlget.sourceforge.net/) could be a good > > candidate. > > * uget - easy-to-use download manager written in GTK+: from > the package long description, looks a bit too feature-full. > > I did not find any other candidate in Debian that integrates with the > web browser. Outside of it, there are: > > * steadyflow - Simple download manager for GNOME: in Wheezy, not in > Squeeze; a quick look at the build-deps makes me think a backport > is doable. Aims for minimalism and ease of use. > * multiget - graphical download manager: in Squeeze and Wheezy; from > the package long description, looks a bit too feature-full. > * kget: depends on many parts of KDE, so that's a no. I'll add this resaerch to the ticket once an agreement is reached. _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
