intrigeri: > berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (20 Sep 2012 17:30:51 GMT) : > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 01:26:23PM -0400, Robert Ransom wrote: > >> On 9/20/12, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org <berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org> > >> wrote: > >> > I've imported all of them but four that I felt weren't necessary: > >> > * 0007-Make-Tor-Browser-exit-when-not-launched-from-Vidalia.patch > >> > >> Do not omit this patch. > > > But in Tails, the browser isn't started by vidalia. Is there another > > reason I don't get? > > Yes, but I only understand it now. Or at least, I think I do. > > This patch prevents us from running a torbrowser-like Firefox (in our > case, iceweasel + torbrowser patches) without the torbrowser.version > variable set. That combination does not make sense, and probably never > got any serious exposure to testing => we do want to have the > torbrowser.version variable set, and this patch will be our safeguard, > making sure we don't drop the variable by mistake some day.
Did you have specific ideas for the Unsafe browser while writing that? If I understood correctly, having that patch applied in our binary means we will need to set 'torbrowser.version' even for the Unsafe browser. This might not be a problem in itself, but this would be quite confusing, wouldn't it? -- Ague
pgpuc0DGumB6k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
