> 29/10/12 21:38, anonym wrote: >> 29/10/12 19:41, [email protected] wrote: >>> anonym wrote: >>>> Actually the Tails host I did this from was itself a VirtualBox guest, >>>> so it also shows that nested VMs work, but the nested-guest is slooow. >>> >>> How slow? Unusably slow? Would Tails need to do something different to >>> ship a virtualized tails solution? >> >> Well, about as slow as running from DVD I'd say. It's mostly booting it >> up that takes time. > > Apparently VirtualBox doesn't support hardware virtualization > (VT-x/AMD-V) if it's run inside a guest: > > https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/4032 > > Too bad, at least for people that don't run Tails directly on hardware, > but in a VM. That makes KVM look more attractive, although its GUIs are > less easy to use. Hmm. > > Cheers! > > _______________________________________________ > tails-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev >
Yes, lets think about other virtualization options other than only virtualbox _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
