Hi, On Fri, 03 May 2013 12:46:16 +0200 intrigeri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Alan wrote (02 May 2013 22:54:48 GMT) : > > This is an answer to blockers only. I belive they are all fixed. > > All... but the one about the NM behavior on individual hook failure, > that you apparently have overlooked. See separate email. > > Also, it's not clear to me that someone volunteered to fix the > [todo-later] stuff in time for 0.18.1. Alan, do you? > Yes I will do it for 0.19.
> >> If we go this way, perhaps the args we always want to > >> pass to apt-get (`--yes' and `--quiet') could be stored in a > >> variable on top of the script, and transparently added by > >> _launch_apt_get? > >> > > I prefer to do that later (it will change more code and might > > require more time/testing). > > OK. Added to the "Improvements for a next version" list on the > ticket, then. > Thanks, I forgot it. > > Each APT list contains a "Valid-Until:" field. > > Sure. This field is what I was referring to with my "not valid > anymore" discussion. I'll go find the answer myself, then. > > So apparently: > > * security.d.o Release files are valid for 10 days > * Wheezy and sid indices are valid for 7 days > * Squeeze, deb.torproject.org and deb.tails.boum.org don't set > Valid-Until. My understanding of Max-ValidTime in apt.conf(5) is > that this means "forever valid". > I didn't get the exact question. Thanks for your research. Cheers _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
