On 30/07/13 14:14, intrigeri wrote: > the next Tails developers meeting will take place on Thursday, August > 8, on #tails-dev (OFTC) at 8pm UTC (10pm CEST). Every Tails > contributor is welcome to attend.
Here is the report of what we did tonight. Next low-hanging fruits session =============================== Introduction ------------ Low-hanging fruits meeting: spend a while together on many small tasks that take less than 2 hours each, and are waiting in our TODO list for too long. During these meetings, we exceptionally allow ourselves to do the review & merge process on IRC instead of the usual email-based workflow, so this should all go pretty smoothly. Then, we report back on tails-dev. We also use these meetings to review stuff that's waiting in the queue. Decisions --------- The August low-hanging fruits session will take place on Thursday 15th August 14:00 CEST. intrigeri will announce it. Next shifts: WAN and RM ======================= Introduction ------------ These are roles we take shifts for, and help us organize ourselves: - https://tails.boum.org/contribute/working_together/roles/release_manager/ - https://tails.boum.org/contribute/working_together/roles/welcome_and_annoying_nitpicker/ Current situation: - anonym is the RM for 0.20 - sajolida is acting as the WAN until August 28. Decisions --------- sajolida will ask bertagaz & alan if they want to be WAN after August 28. Else, either he'll do it, or intrigeri will, or we'll do without a WAN. intrigeri will act as a RM for 0.20.1 scheduled on September 9th, and 0.21 2013-10-29, and 0.21.1 2013-12-11. He'll try to find people to help me and share the work. Have a consistent path to persistence root? =========================================== https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5854 This looks like a one-line change inside tails-greeter, to name the opened volume consistently. anonym will tackle it during the August low-hanging fruits session, and if it's more complicated we'll reconsider it. Test suite: fs shares vs snapshots ================================== https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5571 This is no practical issue right now, since we only use FS shares for things that don't care about these bugs: * MAT: should be moved to a dedicated feature anyway * `usb_install`: doesn't use background snapshots ... but a limitation in what we can do in the future, when we want to have libvirt fs shares work even when scenarios are using a background snapshot. 1. reproduce the kernel bug with a recent kernel 2. report that kernel bug, because we are committing to behave this way with our upstreams 3. ask on libvir-list or libvirt-users 4. close that ticket.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
