hi,

anonym wrote (16 Aug 2013 13:19:56 GMT) :
> In related news, just today, someone on #tails-dev expressed
> interest in maintaining I2P in Tails.

Hmmm, this happened at least two times when I was on IRC in the last
two or three months.

> It does, but I wanted to be more explicit. Perhaps we should commit to
> always have sensible-browser -> iceweasel (right now x-www-browser is in
> auto mode)? What about:

>     update-alternatives --set x-www-browser /usr/bin/iceweasel

> in some chroot_local-hook? Or am I just being pedantic?

I'm of the opinion of not trying to fix something if it works,
especially with new code that will have to be maintained.

Cheers!
-- 
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
_______________________________________________
tails-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Reply via email to