On 03/09/13 19:30, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > [email protected] wrote (31 Aug 2013 14:21:44 GMT) : >> So we might want to either: > >> - Say this is a problem in general, and instead remove all those >> packages at the end of the build than setting them a -1 >> pin priority. > > OK, and sorry for causing this mess in the first place. > Well, I guess it was a useful optimization for a while.
I'll do that then. Created ticket #6259. > And perhaps some day, live-build (or whatever we use by then) will > support preferences.d, and we can drop these -1 sections into > a dedicated file that we delete at the end of the build. > >> - Review this list of packages on an ad-hoc basis. > > I don't get what would be the goal of this review. We could decide to keep part of that optimization and keep some packages as -1 if we believe there is no good reason to install them in Tails. >> I'm ready to propose a branch to implement any of those options. I'll do that.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
