Hi, Andreas Kuckartz wrote (16 Sep 2013 08:04:44 GMT) : > But my empirical observations are that this has not been true for > several years now: Debian unstable has been promptly supported with > security fixes.
Well, yes and no. It is correct that Debian unstable is not supported by the security team. But this does not mean that it's in a bad shape security-wise: it's just hard to predict and rely upon. Security fixes in unstable generally do happen fast (and certainly faster than in testing since the secure-testing effort faded out), *but* it all depends on the package maintainers. Hoping it helps :) If you are interested to go on with this discussion, then perhaps it could be moved to a more appropriate place such as the debian-user mailing-list? (Or it should be clarified how this relates to Tails development.) Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
