[email protected] wrote (07 Oct 2013 09:13:04 GMT) : > I have no strong opinion on that. On the one hand it looks like a quite > marginal use case, but on the other hand, and as you said, the > additional software feature might not be enough to allow that use case. > That would be low priority, though.
I'm fine with this classification as far as our collective place is concerned. However, FYI I think I'll personally treat it with a little higher priority, as I think that supporting such "advanced" usecases has potential to attract a kind of power-users who could usefully contribute to Tails. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
