Yar! On 2013-11-13 11:07 AM, intrigeri wrote: > > It's awesome, and way better than "good enough", if you are acting > purely as the upstream author. It's bad practice if you intend to act > as the lone maintainer of this package in Debian.
Uh... didn't know that was an option... > An intermediary option would be to go for team-maintenance: I'd very > much like co-maintaining this package with you in Debian. Initially, > I could do the parts you're not at ease with yet (e.g. pbuilder), and > obviously I would upload the packages. On the long-run, it would be > even better if you did everything yourself, and I was only needed for > the occasional peer-review. How does it sound? That sounds absolutely brilliant. > Once we have made a decision on this topic, it'll be obvious who > should file the ITP bug :) > I suppose I'm filing an ITP soon :) -- Kevin C. Krinke <[email protected]> GnuPG - 851662D2 - 0x18C67F61851662D2 http://kevin.c.krinke.ca/851662D2.asc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
