Hi, [It's unclear for me if we discuss on the ML or on the bug report. I personally prefer the ML] > > Having a look at the entries we have in our menus: > > * 1. Few applications only appears with their names (KeePassX, I2P). > * 2. Many applications show their name plus their function (Iceweasel > Web Browser, Brasero Disc Burner) > * 3. Some other applications don't show their name but only their > function (File Browser, Disk Utility). This last kind of applications > are often system tools or core GNOME applications, that don't need to > be named even if they have a name. > > Regarding WhisperBack, I feel that having only "Report an error" in > the menu wouldn't work. Because we won't be able to say "please > report an error using WhisperBack" anymore to people, if WhisperBack > looses its name by not appearing in the menu, like Palimpsest did for > example. > Why ? We have "Configure persistent volume", "Tails installer", ...
> So if we want to menu entry to be more explicit, we should move it > from case 1 to case 2 If we're not happy with case 3, then I think we should go to case 2. I think case 1 is bad: - "In the menu item name, include a description of functionality in addition to the proper name of the application" (https://developer.gnome.org/hig-book/3.0/desktop-application-menu.html.en#menu-item-functional-description) - "In the menu item name, include a description of the functionality and the name of the application" (http://wiki.xfce.org/dev/hig/general) > by adding a function: "WhisperBack Error Reporter"? That sounds > ugly :) What about "Report an error with WisperBack"? Cheers _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
