[email protected] wrote (17 Dec 2013 09:34:24 GMT) : > intrigeri: >> In any case, I don't see why this is so important, but I see why you >> folks don't share this feeling, as you're missing some background info >> that didn't make it out of my mind to a public document yet: this >> launcher was only added to make testers' life easier, until >> incremental upgrades are enabled by default. Then, my plan is to >> remove it.
> Ah! Is that what you mean when saying "enabled by default"? That the > upgrade mechanism will run on its own, without the user manually > starting it from the menu? Exactly. > Maybe you need to clarify (to me at least) > what will be the UX when once this "enabled by default" happened... Just what you described above. Any specific question? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
