28/12/13 19:46, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (28 Dec 2013 17:25:37 GMT) : >> 27/12/13 18:05, intrigeri wrote: >>> I've pushed a few minor improvements on top (oh crap, I realize I've >>> done this in feature/spoof-mac, which is the right place IMO, but not >>> the way you've been doing it — I'm sorry). > >> The reason I wanted to have the design in our master branch and not the >> feature branch was to make it available on our website so it can be >> linked to in the call for testing. Like in your CFT for incremental >> updates I want to urge people with "security auditing skills" to have a >> look at the design, and I think they'd be encouraged better like this >> compared to linking to the raw markdown in git. > > I see, and I think you're totally right. If you want, I'll cherry-pick > the relevant commits into master later today or tomorrow. Shall I?
Please do! >>> (I would personally have done this in two steps, first issuing a clear >>> call for testing on tails-dev, and second a broader public call for >>> testing, but well, I guess it's too late now, so go, go, go! :) > >> Ok. Why? To catch show stoppers before the public call? > > Yes. AFAICT, only you and me have tested this code so far, on a pretty > limited range of hardware. Anyway, here we go, fingers crossed :) :) Cheers! _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
