Hi, Mark Smith wrote (19 Feb 2014 14:14:31 GMT) : > The main reason we proposed the "exit browser after configuration" solution > was > because we were not sure how much work it would be to create a standalone XUL > app. > But you have already done the work. The downside I see is that you will need > to ship > (and maintain) XULRunner. But maybe you already need to do that for other > reasons.
We're shipping xulrunner anyway, as that's the way Debian's Iceweasel is packaged (iceweasel depends on xulrunner). > Another small consideration is that we (TBB developers) will probably not > test Tor > Launcher as a standalone XUL application because we will not be using it that > way... > so it is possible we will accidentally break something that is needed in that > mode. > Of course we will try not to do so. Right. This may be mitigating by adding Jenkins jobs that daily build and test Tails with a Git snapshot of Tor Launcher. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
