anonym wrote (21 Feb 2014 03:20:36 GMT) : > I want to merge this, but I'm tempted to delay it until some of the > other Tails Greeter merges are also in, to avoid some of the packaging > overhead. Therefore I also leave the ticket as is until I actually merge > it. Does this make sense?
Why not. I'm not fond of delaying this 2 months old merge request any longer, but well, I see what you mean. Practically speaking, this means that the one who will review and merge the bridges or MAC spoofing branch (whichever is ready first) will need to merge that one at the same time, right? If I'm correct, then please mark the ticket as blocked by the one, among bridges support and MAC spoofing, that you believe will be ready for merging first, and please add a note to the blocking ticket so that the reviewer remembers they should do it. ... or just decide that the organization overhead would actually take more time than just releasing a new t-g with that branch in :P Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
