27/02/14 19:25, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > [email protected] wrote (27 Feb 2014 14:58:11 GMT) : >> anonym wrote: >>> As a side note, I suppose it'd be nice to use stem [1] to greatly >>> simplify the script and in particular avoid the low-level socket >>> stuff > > Fully agreed. This refactoring would be worth a low-priority ticket, > IMHO: if properly documented, this would be a good "Easy" coding task > for new contributors :)
Tracked in #6788. >>> but it's not packaged in Debian. :/ > > It is: [...] Sorry, I meant "Debian squeeze", which means that it's not relevant at the moment since time is short. > Want to request a backport for Wheezy, so that we can use it in 1.1+? > > (In any case, I doubt it's worth backporting it for Squeeze *now*, so > the low-priority refactoring ticket, if any, should be blocked by > #6015.) Actually I think we can wait with all of this until the time we want to extend the control port filter, if it ever comes. Just to not waste people's time unnecessarily. Cheers! _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
