> Note that Tails is not participating to GSoC this year, but perhaps > someone at the Tor Project will be happy to mentor something close to > what you're suggesting here.
ok ... > >> In this context I thought it could be useful to get one step further >> with the voip topic on tails. > > This would certainly be most welcome! > >> My idea is to implement and extend linphone to get a possibilty of >> anomynous voice calls (e.g. with a button to register oneself >> automatically at ostel etc.). > > You probbly mean pseudonymous, then, not anonymous, right? no i mean anonymous, by creating new random account on every call (in this case we have to trust ostel.co - guardian project). > >> Also I am looking forward to test and fit the delays and codecs. > > Indeed, testing this kind of stuff in the context of Tor-ified > connections seems very useful to me. Note that the Tor folks have > recently tested Mumble, and documented their findings: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorifyHOWTO/Mumble > >> What do think about this idea? > > It's unclear to me that Linphone can work in Tails without using > onioncat. Is your plan to use onioncat, or? More information can be > found there: > > * https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5709 > * https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/VoIP_support/ perhaps i have a error in reasoning. why you need vpn for it? for e.g. with linphone you can tunnel the traffic over tcp > > Also, I have to say the situation regarding "what's the best VoIP > software for Tails?" is quite less clear now than it was a few years > ago, as the landscape has changed a bit: > > * the Tor folks have been experimenting with Mumble (which arguably > is not meant for P2P VoIP, but perhaps this can be fixed with > OnionCat) > * Jitsi entered Debian (it was previously discarded from our panel, > due to the difficulty of packaging it properly, but this was > apparently dealt with since then) > * much energy has been put in WebRTC, that likely won't work over > Tor any time soon > > Do you think Linphone is a better bet for Tails than Jitsi? > If so, I'd be delighted to learn why :) jitsi is not working without udp. and: i think zrtp is better supported by linphone > >> What do you think about the implicit influence interference of >> projects by google (also with GSoC)? For example the google partnership >> with mozilla has the result that firefox phone depends more and more on >> parts of android. > > The influence on... what exactly? :) i don´t know gsoc ... but normally google don´t give anything without taking influence on it > >> And: Why you open the bluetooth device on tails? What is the reason? > > Tails is a general purpose OS, and people happen to have bluetooth > hardware they want to use. > >> I think it is a problem in a view of security. Similar to the >> mac-address it can identify people (e.g. at least by fhs-packets in the >> discoverable modus). > > Last time I checked, we did not ship the bluez stack. Knowing this, > does the problem you're evoking here apply to Tails? E.g. is this > identifying info broadcasted in current Tails? current tails: yes i think so. but i don´t have bluetooth - so i can´t test it (wireshark). regards _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
