anonym wrote (12 May 2014 14:29:56 GMT) : >> Do you mind if I assign this ticket to you (anonym), set it as >> a blocker to make a decision on #6400, and flag it for the 2.0 >> milestone (on the grounds that making sure our test suite's >> dependencies won't break to often is definitely an important >> sustainability matter)?
> Please do! Done. > FWIW, my personal fear has been that RJB would break with Java 7, which > would make Jessie's potential discontinuation of Java 6 [1] a problem, > but I've at least confirmed that RJB plays well with Java 7 (and Sikuli > script reportedly does, too). Good to know :) Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
