01/07/14 19:33, anonym wrote: > 01/07/14 19:14, intrigeri wrote: >> anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 16:38:12 GMT) : >>> Next (and I think this is unrealted to this branch) in "Scenario: >>> Upgrading an old Tails USB installation from an ISO image, running on >>> the old version" I get: >> >>> Then Tails is installed on USB drive "to_upgrade" >>> # features/step_definitions/usb.rb:163 >>> USB drive 'to_upgrade' has differences in /live: >>> Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/filesystem.packages and >>> /mnt/new/live/filesystem.packages differ >>> Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/filesystem.squashfs and >>> /mnt/new/live/filesystem.squashfs differ >>> Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/initrd.img and >>> /mnt/new/live/initrd.img differ >>> Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/initrd2.img and >>> /mnt/new/live/initrd2.img differ >> >>> I'll get back to this. >> >> I'm curious. > > Indeed, it's unrelated to bugfix/7443-persistent-files-permission, but > was introduced in bugfix/7345-upgrade-from-iso-from-1.0-to-1.1. > > The problem with "Tails is installed on USB drive X" is that it checks > that the *running* Tails is installed on the target device, which > obviously fails when doing an upgrade from ISO running an old Tails. > That it worked for the same scenario running the current Tails is just > incidental. > > I've pushed a fix in commit f713311 to > bugfix/7345-upgrade-from-iso-from-1.0-to-1.1 and verified that it works. > Please review'n'merge into testing and devel.
intrigeri reviewed the code, and trusted me on that I've managed to run through the tests successfully, so I do the merge myself. Merged! Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
