intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > [email protected] wrote (13 Jul 2014 12:41:29 GMT) : >> intrigeri wrote: >>> Technically (as you very well know :), we're shipping GNOME 3, but >>> running it in Fallback mode. Do you think it's worth mentioning? >>> Granted, it would be more important to mention on the About page than >>> on this one >>> (doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop), but I'm >>> wondering how wrong it is to make Tails users think that *this* is how >>> GNOME 3 is supposed to look like. > >> Done in 3d7f1cc. > > (History rewritten, commit ids changed... anyway :) > > Good. I've fixed the HTML in 565d03b. > >>>> The <span class="guisubmenu">System Tools</span> submenu allows you to >>>> customize >>>> the GNOME desktop or the system. >>> >>> How about making it clear that such customization won't survive >>> a reboot? (No, that's not a regression brought by this branch, just >>> mentioning it in passing, as I wonder how much this sentence accounts >>> for the numerous reports we have of "my customizition are forgotten".) > >> Done in ef79ca6. > > I can find this commit neither with that ID, nor on doc/wheezy. > >>> Regarding commit 98dafca, I wonder if maybe two different note divs >>> would be better, since the two notes added there are actually >>> orthogonal. BTW, I would put the second one first, as it seems more >>> important to me, and maybe use a warning styling (assuming we have >>> one) rather than a note. > >> Done in c7f341d. > > Same, cannot find it. > >>> Regarding commit 0d2cb74 ("Remove big bullet points"), I'm curious >>> why. I only have heard good things about this clear indication that >>> one is making progress through a step-by-step process. OTOH, given >>> bc5b8e9, I get why we don't want two different numberings. > >> The idea here was to keep using them on very special pages like the >> Download page but to not use them regularly on instructions steps. They >> take up quite a bit of vertical space and require headings. Having more >> compact instructions is also a way of making them clearer. > >> But now that you forced me to have a second thought about it, I realized >> that having numbers for the h2 headings, which correspond to a sequence >> here as well (on the contrary to h1 headings), might be a good thing. >> Then we could speak of step 1.3 for example. > >> So what do you think of b4b048e? > > Cannot find it. > >>> To end with, the instructions to install seahorse-nautilus on Debian >>> (doc/get/verify_the_iso_image_using_gnome) are wrong: unless specified >>> explicitly, apt-get won't automatically fetch the package >>> from backports. > >> I don't feel like giving the full instructions on using backports in >> that page. So I did commit a689e82 to point to them. If that doesn't >> satisfy you, please be more explicit on how this should be documented. > > Good. > >> Ready for merge again, assigning back the review to you. > > Merged what I could see, reassigned back to you.
I got them misplaced. Now it's ec4c8a5, 1d69e6b, and b5457b3. Sorry. -- sajolida
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
