intrigeri: > @Patrick: why is the build-dep on config-package-dev versionned to > 0.5.1? Isn't Wheezy's 4.13 good enough for our needs? (Worst case, we > can fetch 0.5.1 from wheezy-backports, but still :)
Even it has been obsoleted by now, I like answering it maybe for the future. wheezy: config-package-dev (4.13) CDBS modules for building configuration packages wheezy-backports config-package-dev (5.1.1~bpo70+1) Debhelper (and CDBS) modules for building configuration packages I was using Debhelper. Looked like the better choice than learning CDBS just for this. >>> = litian warning init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs = > >>> E: wiperam: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs >>> etc/init.d/tails-reconfigure-kexec: required-start >>> E: wiperam: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs >>> etc/init.d/tails-reconfigure-memlockd: required-start > >>> You probably don't want to add remote_fs as dependency. Should I add a >>> lintian override? Lintian override reason? > >> I'm unsure, will look at it tomorrow. > > Added $remote_fs dependency. Any reason why we should not have? You tell me. :) If it works, everything is fine. _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
