Hi, Kill Your TV wrote (28 Aug 2014 18:35:50 GMT) : > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:44:03 +0000 (UTC) > Kill Your TV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The proper fix will be to have the wrapper package additionally allow >> for the *-headless jre/jdk packages to be used. (My packages also need >> to be fixed to allow the -headless packages as alternate deps; I'll >> add that resultant patch to the 'please update the wrapper packages' >> that I'm going to file with the upstream DD). > Earlier today[0] I filed the wishlist bug[1] to get the wrapper > updated, and it's already closed (and getting uploaded to > unstable). Congrats! \o/ > Since it has been uploaded to unstable, once it trickles down to jessie > (or wheezy-backports) It has now migrated to testing, but can't be installed as-is on Wheezy (at least due to Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), and I didn't look further). Do you want to try backporting it, and ask the maintainers if they're interested in sponsoring an upload to wheezy-backports? In any case: please consider submitting a branch (forked off feature/jessie) that implements this for Tails/Jessie :) > the openjdk-7-jre package can be changed to openjdk-7-jre-headless > which should save a bit more space on the ISOs. (OpenJDK7 probably > won't be pulled in automatically until Jessie). Cool. It would be useful to know how much actual ISO size it would save, to decide whether the backporting work is worth it. Cheers, -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
