intrigeri wrote: > Great, but now I'm in doubt: the rationale for explicitly discussing > file-backed TrueCrypt volumes was that it's the most common usecase. > And now, the doc only speaks of *devices*, as in "Replace [device] > with the name of the device". I'm not sure whether anyone will guess > that they can as well pass the name of a regular file, as opposed to > a device name. > > How about "Replace [device] with the name of the device or file that > contains your TrueCrypt volume", or similar? > > I'm reassigning to you once more, then.
Yeah, more round trips! I hope this one is the last one. Now I committed 6e1c2d2..13530a4. -- sajolida _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
