26/09/14 06:52, intrigeri wrote: > hi, > > [email protected] wrote (25 Sep 2014 16:47:09 GMT) : >> intrigeri wrote: >>> So, the question is: do we want to enable stable-proposed-updates in >>> the 1.2 build, to get the package updates that will be in the Wheezy >>> point-release, or not? > >> Any arguments against? > > The only ones I see are: > > - additional work to enable s-p-u at the right time, and disable it at > the right time too; I can help telling when the right time is, > assuming the RM keeps track of the need thereof and asks me
I don't get it. Wouldn't you tell me when the time is right? What is it I have to ask? > - (minor) risks of regressions in updated packages, that we'll have > very little time to discover... unless we enable s-p-u ASAP, which > IMO is the way to go, and yet another way to be nice to Debian :) Doesn't sound bad, so I say we do this ASAP if you can first clarify the previous point. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
