14/10/14 14:45, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (14 Oct 2014 11:54:38 GMT) : >>> I thought this was fixed by the version from wheezy-backports. If so, >>> why aren't we using it? > >> Nope. I couldn't get the one in Wheezy to work at all. > > I wrote wheezy-*backports*, so maybe there's a misunderstanding here?
Err, what I was gonna write was: I couldn't get the one in Wheezy to work at all, and the one from wheezy-backports only works with http, not https. Vagrant is set up to use the one from wheezy-backports. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
