Hi, [Dropping tbb-dev from the Cc list. Let's get our stuff clearer, and then come back to them if needed.]
anonym wrote (23 Oct 2014 12:42:02 GMT) : > 23/10/14 11:08, Georg Koppen wrote: >>> [1] https://tails.boum.org/contribute/design/#index40h3 >> >> what does adding Adblock plus have for a benefit wrt to tracking >> avoidance? To put it more precisely: In which cases are the defenses in >> the current Tor Browser not adequate yet Adblock plus fixes this >> situation (I could not find anything on the link you gave above about >> it)? > In all honesty, it's not very clear to me why we state this. Indeed, it seems wrong, and quite far from what our thinking on it has been for at least a couple years. It could be the case that we still are saying that because of #5975 ("Update design documentation about network fingerprinting") not having been tackled yet. > For me personally, however, the biggest benefit with AdBlock Plus is > that I can enjoy my browsing experience as ad-free. This may not be a > good argument for its inclusion, though, just a personal anecdote. :) Same here. Now, I'm not opposed to trying it out: let's remove AdBlock in our next major release, and see what users say. It might be that the next step is to re-add it immediately until we have persistence for add-ons and their configuration, but it might also be the case that very few people complain. Cheers! -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
