Hi, On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 08:07:46PM +0000, sajolida wrote: > bertagaz: > > 0. We might also want a mechanism for devs to pro-actively state they want > > to > > keep their branches being build even if the last commit was older than the > > last release. IIRC > > If I understand correctly, adding a dummy commit would bring back my > branch in the set of branches that are automatically built. So maybe we > don't need a dedicated mechanism handle those rare cases.
That's the idea, having a timestamp file that would be use for this dummy commit. But it comes for free, sure. :) bert. _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
