Hi, u wrote (24 Jan 2015 19:54:11 GMT) : >> => I'm in favor of #1.
> Me too. OK, I'll start preparing things in this direction, then. (Not to say we can't revert to #2 or something else later, so more input is still welcome until the end of the month :) > Indeed, as I am co-maintaining torbrowser-launcher in Debian and work on > AppArmor a lot these days, I can commit to track changes to the upstream > profile. Yay \o/ > Do you want to point me at the Tails-specific patch so I can see what we > are talking about? I'll do that once I have implemented it as a patch. In the meantime: https://git-tails.immerda.ch/tails/tree/config/chroot_local-includes/etc/apparmor.d/torbrowser?h=feature/5525-sandbox-web-browser > Anything else i should know or do? So far, I don't think so. I'll soon ask for input on this web browser sandboxing on tails-ux@ for other reasons (spoiler: https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/sandbox_the_web_browser/#index3h1), and I hope to send a call for testing in a next few days or, failing that, February 6. Cheers! -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
