anonym wrote (15 Apr 2015 09:24:48 GMT) : > The branch is based on devel (although only the changelog (1.4 dummy > entry) differs from stable), but it is a bugfix so we'd miss out on it > in a potential Tails 1.3.3. Is this really intentional?
Yes. I didn't want to risk regressions without letting this code first mature for a while in a branch that people actually test (that is, devel). That's why I didn't propose it for 1.3.2, while it was ready before that release. > Of course, with #8654 the change is in Git for Tails proper. I suppose I > should still merge into the builder-wheezy APT suite, right? I think so, yes. Cheers! -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
