ghostla...@hush.com: > On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:01:44 +0000 "sajolida" > <sajol...@pimienta.org> wrote: >> I'm replacing this in the thread it belongs. ghostlands, please do >> "Reply" to this email if you want to stay in the loop. > >> PS: And please reply inline (below the quote) as we usually do. > >> ghostla...@hush.com: >>> Hi, random lurker speaking up here with a question. >>> >>> I don't mean to distract from the topic, but regarding >>> interoperability, what about FreeOTFE? It's source was >> available, >>> and someone else has picked it up and forked it on GitHub as >>> DoxBox: https://github.com/t-d-k/doxbox >>> >>> Is there any consideration underway to support this solution and >>> its development? I know it wouldn't solve all of the issues with >>> the absence of TrueCrypt, but it certainly would broaden the >>> relevance of LUKS. > >> Right, if we're left with interoperability as the main reason to >> stick >> with the TrueCrypt disk format, then we might as well look at this >> option the other way around and advertise tools to open LUKS on >> other operating systems. > > How's this? :) > > No interest in my DoxBox suggestion/question, though? I'm curious > if anyone here thinks this is code worth using or even just paying > attention to. It is literally the only serious LUKS implementation > for Windows, it seems possibly important.
Hi, and sorry for not answering better your previous email. I knew about FreeOFTE but I didn't knew it was taken over by doxbox, thanks for that info. Indeed, I think having better LUKS tools in other operating systems would also be a valid way to go. Doxbox seems to be quite fresh still but active. I hope it lives long. Ah, and we would also need an implementation for Mac OS X. -- sajolida _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
