On 28/01/16 10:55, sycamoreone wrote: > flapflap: >> I get a certificate warning when visiting https://git.tails.boum.org, >> issued by immerda.ch. > > The certificate served by https://git.tails.boum.org is signed by > immerda.ch itself (CN of the issuer is immerda_public_web_4-ca), so it > won't be accepted by browser by default.
and tails.boum.org / boum.org use a wildcard certificate *.boum.org issued by Gandi > But this is probably not much of a problem, as I don't believe that site > is really for general use: The official place for Tails' Git > repositories is https://git-tails.immerda.ch/, which has a proper > certificate signed by Gandi Standard SSL CA 2. git.tails.boum.org is > only used by "developers with write access to the repositories" (see > https://tails.boum.org/contribute/git/). > > That of course doesn't mean that having a letsencrypt certificate > wouldn't be great :). I guess it depends on what the certificate is intended to be used for. I think supporting CA-Cert is also a good thing (tm). Whatever, I guess documented consistency is important. Shine, Adam.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
