Jacob Appelbaum wrote (14 Feb 2016 13:04:58 GMT) : > I feel a bit sad to see this rehashed. Please just drop all packets on > the floor?
> People who use Tails and expect it to keep them safely torified are > likely still vulnerable to things we wrote in our paper (vpwned). > Allowing users by default to make non-tor connections, except for > specific pluggable transports or dhcp, will probably ensure that > variations on the disclosed issues stay relevant. > If a user wants to use a printer or touch the local subnet, why not > make them jump through a (`sudo unsafe-network-unlock`) hoop? Why > leave every other user vulnerable by default? I think you're confusing this thread with another one, that is totally orthogonal as I see it. Cheers, -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
