sajolida:
> intrigeri:
>> So I propose that we drop the "QA Check" field and instead, introduce
>> a "Needs Validation" status.

> Good idea! Works for me.

:)

> What would happen to tickets that go back-and-forth between the main
> author and the reviewer? Would they stay in "Needs Validation" or go
> back-and-forth between "In Progress" and "Needs Validation"?

The latter, as per:

  And if the reviewer requests changes, they would set the status
  back to "In Progress".

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri
_______________________________________________
Tails-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to